Browse

Scenario evaluated escalation: reminder first, then assertive safety intervention if ignored.

Key difference from medical scenarios: security discretion, remote parking, and possible evacuation preparation.

Prompt specifically asked for communication flow with each resource.

The report emphasized dispatch value: gate readiness and support coordination, especially for pilots unfamiliar with airline dispatch resources.

Key signal: decisive captain judgment, 2-in/2-out, medical escalation, and a post-event crew debrief.

Broad full-flight profile. The interviewer moved between weather, systems, airport markings, CRM, and approach briefing.

The specific expected item was asking ATC to notify company while the captain focuses on flying back.

Primary evaluation points: fuel state, alternate selection, approach minimums, and 91.175 discipline.

The answer should show 2-in/2-out, fuel awareness, and a clear final divert decision rather than waiting indefinitely.

Key signal: captain authority and fuel discipline over company convenience.

The interviewer emphasized shared mental model, role-played calls, and passenger communication.

Emphasize safety-related severity, crew communication, and security at the gate if continuing.

Short report, but useful as evaluator guidance: avoid vague “I probably would” language.

Airport-closure scenario. The core is timely information gathering and a fuel-based divert decision.

The report noted some confusion, but recovering and verbalizing the logic was viewed positively.

Passenger-care considerations were specifically appreciated, not just regulatory minimums.

The interviewer looked for checklist discipline, resource use, and conservative judgment after the relight.

The trap was being tempted back to destination without enough fuel margin.

The interviewer suggested slowing down as a good tool to buy time while planning.

Specific missed item: ask ATC how long the runway is expected to be closed.